|
Evaluation of Alternative Municipal Solid Waste Management Option Towards Circular Economy and Smart City Model |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Thidarat Kridakorn Na Ayutthaya |
| Title | Evaluation of Alternative Municipal Solid Waste Management Option Towards Circular Economy and Smart City Model |
| Contributor | Napat Jakrawatana, Saoharit Nitayavardhana, Pharkphum Rakruam, Chummanut Maneesiri |
| Publisher | Environmental Engineering Association of Thailand |
| Publication Year | 2564 |
| Journal Title | Thai Environmental Engineering Journal (TEEJ) |
| Journal Vol. | 35 |
| Journal No. | 2 |
| Page no. | 81-91 |
| Keyword | municipal solid waste, circular economy, zero waste, smart city, mass flow analysis |
| URL Website | https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/teej |
| Website title | Thai Environmental Engineering Journal (TEEJ) |
| ISSN | 2673-0359 |
| Abstract | The increasing urbanization is a great challenge for city development and management. One major problem is the rising amount of municipal solid waste due to food product demand and other living essentials. One of the Circular Economic's concepts is keepingproducts and material in use, so adding a sorting list and extracting more items can reduce waste before ending up at the landfill. Therefore, to understand a variety of characteristics and composition of waste for proper waste management. This research main identifies waste composition and develops the material flow diagram of integrated municipal solid waste by applying the alternative model towards Circular economics. Chiang Mai University had been selected as a study area and represented the Smart Citymodel. The generated waste averaged 10.2 Ton per day of area 2,493 rai and 144 grams per day per person. The waste composition is organics, plastic, paper, general, metal, glass, and hazardous waste as ratio 59:15:12:10:2:1:1, respectively. Applying the integrated material flow diagram shows the overall base case and offers two alternatives for waste management. Although the increasing capacity of IBMC is a practical solution that causes sorting and separating by machineas increasing recycling rate 14.5%. And the implementation of circular practice is promptas increasing recycling rate 7.2%. The benefit of the model and alternative demonstration of waste management based on Ching Mai university can also be applied to work with various organizations, communities, and cities. |