|
The Study of Learning Achievements and Developmental Scores from Biology Subject of the Tenth Grade Students: The Comparison between the 5E Inquiry Learning Model and the Active Learning Model Employed in Cellular Respiration Topic |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Kittikorn Hongyim, Kanokporn Chayaburakul |
| Title | The Study of Learning Achievements and Developmental Scores from Biology Subject of the Tenth Grade Students: The Comparison between the 5E Inquiry Learning Model and the Active Learning Model Employed in Cellular Respiration Topic |
| Publisher | RJES |
| Publication Year | 2560 |
| Journal Title | Rangsit Journal of Educational Studies |
| Journal Vol. | 4 |
| Journal No. | 2 |
| Page no. | 1-Jan |
| Keyword | Active Learning Model, 5E Inquiry Learning Model, Cellular respiration,Secondary school students |
| ISSN | 2408-1809 |
| Abstract | The action study aims (1) to compare the learning achievements in Biology subject, in thetopic of Cellular Respiration of the tenth grade students from KanaratbamrungPathumthani School between the experimental groups using Active Learning Model and5E Inquiry Learning Model and (2) compare the developmental scores from Biologysubject, in the topic of Cellular Respiration of the tenth grade students fromKanaratbamrung Pathumthani School between the experimental groups one using ActiveLearning Model and the other, 5E Inquiry Learning Model. The sample of this study isthe tenth grade students from two classrooms of Science-Mathematics major,Kanaratbamrung Pathumthani School, Muang District, Pathumthani province. The studywas conducted in the first semester, Academic year 2017. The samples were selected bypurposive sampling method. In addition, it is necessary to note that both classrooms wereunder the responsibility of the researcher as a teacher. Four research instruments were (1)the lesson plans of Active Learning Model and 5E Inquiry Learning Model: 6 plans pereach model, (2) Student and Teacher Behavioral Observation Form, (3) the Field Notedesigned to record any phenomenon that may occur during the in-class period and (4) theLearning Achievement Test. The results of the study are (1) the post-learningachievements of the tenth grade students showed that the experimental group using the 5EInquiry Learning Model (Class 3 students) had higher scores than the experimental groupusing the Active Learning Model (Class 2 students). The results indicated the statisticallysignificant difference (p < 0.05) and (2) the developmental scores of the tenth gradestudents between the experimental group using the Active Learning Model (Class 2students), while the experimental group using the 5E Inquiry Learning model (Class 3students) showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). |
