|
ความสามารถในการใช้ตัวแทนทางคณิตศาสตร์และการให้เหตุผลทางคณิตศาสตร์ในชีวิตจริง |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | อภินันท์ โพธิ์แก้ว |
| Title | ความสามารถในการใช้ตัวแทนทางคณิตศาสตร์และการให้เหตุผลทางคณิตศาสตร์ในชีวิตจริง |
| Publisher | ศูนย์นวัตกรรมทางศึกษา สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์ และสื่อออนไลน์ |
| Publication Year | 2567 |
| Journal Title | An Online Journal of Education |
| Journal Vol. | 19 |
| Journal No. | 2 |
| Page no. | OJED1902002 (14 pages) |
| Keyword | mathematical representation, mathematical reasoning, real life |
| URL Website | https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/OJED |
| Website title | ojed |
| ISSN | 1905-4491 (Online) |
| Abstract | The purposes of this research were to: 1) compare the mathematical representation abilities of students in real life scenarios to a benchmark of 50 percent, 2) study the level of mathematical representation ability of students in real life scenarios, 3) compare the mathematical reasoning ability of students in real life scenarios to a benchmark of 50 percent, and 4) study the level of mathematical reasoning ability of students in real life scenarios. The sample consisted of tenth-grade students; these students were classified into two groups, one group of 414 students and one group of 398 students, to study the mathematical representation ability and the mathematical reasoning ability in real life scenarios, respectively. The instruments used for research included a mathematical representation ability test and a mathematical reasoning ability test. The data were analyzed using arithmetic mean, standard deviation, t-test, frequency, and percentage statistics. The results of the study revealed that: 1) the mathematical representation ability of students in real-life scenarios were lower than the minimum criteria of 50 percent at the .05 level of significance; 2) the mathematical representation ability of students in real-life scenarios were at the most improved level, 3) the mathematical reasoning ability of students in real-life scenarios were lower than the minimum criteria of 50 percent at the .05 level of significance; and 4) the mathematical reasoning ability of students in real-life scenarios were at the most improved level. |
