|
Factor analysis for creating and developing the competency evaluation model |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Phichsinee Chomphucome |
| Title | Factor analysis for creating and developing the competency evaluation model |
| Publisher | Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University |
| Publication Year | 2561 |
| Journal Title | Journal of Thai Interdisciplinary Research |
| Journal Vol. | 13 |
| Journal No. | 5 |
| Page no. | 1 |
| Keyword | applied statistics, evaluation model, pre-service teachers, competency, 21st century |
| URL Website | http://rdi.npru.ac.th |
| Website title | วารสารวิจัยสหวิทยาการไทย |
| ISSN | 2465-3837 |
| Abstract | The research aims to study and apply a proper statistical method for creating and developing the evaluationmodel of pre-service teachers' competency in the 21st century. Data collection process includes an interview, focusgroup, questionnaire and evaluation. Descriptive statistics, Exploratory Factor Analysis and First and Second - OrderConfirmatory Factor Analysis are the techniques used for data analysis. The samples of 1284 instructors andteachers in training unit are collected for the Factor analysis. The study presents 10 factors of the pre-serviceteacher competency in the 21st Century: (1) the proficiency of professional teachers' basic subjects, (2) theproficiency to promote learning efficiency, (3) the proficiency of the social context, (4) the learning managementskills, (5) the media technology skills, (6) the communication skills, (7) the social skills, (8) the conscious andawareness, (9) the self-practice, and (10) the moral and ethics. The result shows that KMO =0.979 and the Bartlett'sTest shows all indicators are correlated at ?= 0.05. The total variance of the components is 79.782%. The fit indexesindicate the consistency of the structure evaluation model with empirical data includes Chi square/df. =1.96,RMSEA = 0.027, CFI =1.00 and GFI=0.93. The validity is measured by t>|1.96| at ?=0.05 and the reliability ofindicator using R2 are between 0.62 to 0.83 for all 60 indicators. The construct reliability of this model are between0.91 - 0.96 indicating a good reliability and the construct validity is consistent with standard criterion. The modelincludes 5 evaluation factors: focus group, scope, procedure, judgment, and report. |
