|
Evaluation of the Project on the Development of Professional Qualified Teacher Using Coaching and Mentoring, Faculty of Naresuan University and the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 38 and 39 and Sukhothai Primary Educational Service Area Office 2 |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | 1. Wareerat Kaewurai 2. Teamjan Parnichprarinchai 3. Chaiwat Suttirat 4. Chalong Chatruprachewin 5. Amornrat Wattanatorn 6. Tipparat Sittiwong |
| Title | Evaluation of the Project on the Development of Professional Qualified Teacher Using Coaching and Mentoring, Faculty of Naresuan University and the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 38 and 39 and Sukhothai Primary Educational Service Area Office 2 |
| Publisher | Graduate School;Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University |
| Publication Year | 2557 |
| Journal Title | SOCIAL SCIENCES RESEARCH AND ACADEMIC JOURNAL |
| Journal Vol. | 9 |
| Journal No. | 27 |
| Page no. | 15-32 |
| Keyword | project evaluation, professional qualified teacher, coaching and mentoring |
| ISSN | 2408-1647 |
| Abstract | The purpose of this study is to evaluate the conduct of professional qualified teacher project by using coaching and mentoring. Research resources are as follows: 1) Trainees: school administrators, superintendents and teachers at the total of 318. 2) The follow-up supervisors: 87 school administrators and superintendents and 30 faculty - staff from Faculty of Education, Naresuan University 3) The trainers: 8 faculty-staff from Faculty of Education, Naresuan University. The operating duration composes of two phases: Phase 1 Training: 2-day units of 1) coaching and mentoring processes, 2) 5-step ladder' learning process and 3) development on the abilities of language skills, numbering and reasoning. Phase 2 4-month of teacher development: 3 times of supervisions on teacher's learning managements, exhibition on teacher's learning management using coaching and mentoring. Instruments used for data collection: 1) Tools for teacher evaluation: 1.1 an evaluation form on knowledge and understanding coaching and mentoring process, 1.2 a test on knowledge and understanding coaching and mentoring process, 1.3 an evaluation form on the ability of being a mentor teacher. 2) Tools for student evaluation: 2.1 an evaluation form on '5-step ladder' learning process, 2.2 evaluation forms on the abilities on language skills, numbering and reasoning, 2.3 an opinion evaluation form on coaching and mentoring. The results are as follows: 1.The training curriculum emphasizes on learning through a wide range of training activities thatiet the trainees construct their own bodies of knowledge and provide collaborative learning among school teachers, superintendents and university educators. The focuses are on the knowledge management and also the integration of knowledge derived from the training and experiences from real life practices in schools. 2.The opinions of the trainees on the project are at a high level. 3.The level of teachers' knowledge and understanding on coaching and mentoring after the training is significantly higher than the before; the before is at a low level and the after is at a high level. As a whole, teachers possess the abilities of coaching and mentoring at moderate to high levels. Teachers' techniques and learning management are found different. 4. Students' ability on '5-step ladder' learning process is at a moderate level. 5. As a whole, the exchange discussions found that 1) the dominant point of the project is the collaboration and impression on working together among university educators, superintendents and school teachers. By means of 'the three partners', the working goal is clear cut on the process of development, and the project should be followed up continuously. |
