|
Creative Leadership of School Administrators, Sa Kaeo Primary Educational Service Area Office 1 |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Phrompiriya Pinagapho |
| Title | Creative Leadership of School Administrators, Sa Kaeo Primary Educational Service Area Office 1 |
| Publisher | DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion. |
| Publication Year | 2566 |
| Journal Title | Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal |
| Journal Vol. | 3 |
| Journal No. | 3 |
| Page no. | 197-210 |
| Keyword | Creative Leadership, School Administrators |
| URL Website | https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IARJ/about |
| Website title | https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IARJ/article/view/266435 |
| ISSN | 2774-0374 |
| Abstract | For modern leaders to build good interpersonal relationships, understand others, and have the ability to communicate effectively creatively, and change management. Modern leaders must build personal and professional networks to increase agility and flexibility in working both inside and outside the organization, adapting to an environment that is conducive to change. The objectives of this research were (1) to study the creative leadership of school administrators. And 2) to compare the creative leadership of school administrators classified by position, educational level, and size of the school. This study was conducted in schools under the Sa Kaeo Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. The sample group was 320 administrators and teachers under Sa Kaeo Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. The research tool was a questionnaire on the creative leadership of school administrators. The basic statistics used for data analysis were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, and F-test. The results showed that (1) The opinions towards creative leadership of school administrators overall were at a high level. And (2) a Comparison of opinions towards creative leadership of school administrators found that; (a) Classified according to the overall position and the side is not different, (b) Classified according to the level of education in general and in each aspect is not different, and (c) classified by the size of educational institutes, the overall difference was statistically significant at the .05 level. |
