|
Ultrasonic Post-polymerization and Surface Treatments Increased the Flexural Strength of Denture Base Reline with Hard Lining Material |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Chairat Wiwatwarrapan |
| Title | Ultrasonic Post-polymerization and Surface Treatments Increased the Flexural Strength of Denture Base Reline with Hard Lining Material |
| Contributor | Tithiphorn Arunwichit |
| Publisher | Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University |
| Publication Year | 2565 |
| Journal Title | Chiang Mai Dental Journal |
| Journal Vol. | 43 |
| Journal No. | 2 |
| Page no. | 42-49 |
| Keyword | denture base, flexural strength, methyl acetate, methyl formate, ultrasonic treatment |
| URL Website | http://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/index |
| Website title | Chiang Mai Dental Journal |
| ISSN | 2773-921X |
| Abstract | Objectives: To evaluate the effect of ultrasonic post-polymerization and chemical surface treatment on the flexural strength of relined denture base.Methods: Ninety heat-polymerized acrylic resin blocks (64x10x2 mm) were randomly divided into three groups by chemical surface treatments before relining; no treatment (N), applied with methyl methacrylate for180 seconds (MMA), and applied with methyl formate: methyl acetate (25:75% v/v (MF-MA)) for15 seconds. The samples were relined with auto-polymerized acrylic resin. Each relined sample was 64x10x3.3 mm. The relined groups were divided to three subgroups based on post-polymerization method: no post-polymerization (X), ultrasonic treatment in water (W), and ultrasonic treatment in 30% ethanol (E). The ultrasonic water bath was set at 40 kHz, 50°C, for 5 minutes. The samples were polished and stored in 37±2°C distilled water for 48±2 hours before undergoing a three-point bending test. The results were analyzed using two-way and one-way ANOVA.Results: There was no interaction between ultrasonic treatment and chemical surface treatment. In each surface treatment group, W groups demonstrated a significantly higher flexural strength than X groups (p<0.05). E groups had a significantly higher flexural strength than W groups (p<0.05). In the same post-polymerization groups, N groups presented a significantly lower flexural strength than the MMA and MF-MA groups (p<0.05). The MMA and MF-MA groups were not significantly different (p>0.05).Conclusions: ultrasonic treatment increased the flexural strength of relined denture base. MMA and MF-MA treatment increased the flexural strength of relined denture base. |