|
Indonesia's role in humanitarian crisis in Rakhine State of Myanmar (2012- 2017) |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Title | Indonesia's role in humanitarian crisis in Rakhine State of Myanmar (2012- 2017) |
| Creator | Muhammad Indrawan Jatmika |
| Contributor | Withaya Sucharithanarugse |
| Publisher | Chulalongkorn University |
| Publication Year | 2561 |
| Keyword | Humanitarian assistance -- Indonesia, International relations -- Indonesia, ความช่วยเหลือด้านมนุษยธรรม -- อินโดนีเซีย, นโยบายต่างประเทศ -- อินโดนีเซีย |
| Abstract | This thesis begins with the question of why does Indonesia consider the humanitarian crisis that occurred in Rakhine State of Myanmar as a very important issue and needs to be taken seriously by conducting soft power diplomacy and humanitarian assistance to address the crisis? Indonesia has the rational choice of conducting soft diplomacy in the form of bilateral and multilateral responses, as well as providing humanitarian assistance in the crisis that occurred in Rakhine state. Theoretical discussion of this paper is carried out on the theory by William D Coplin on various factors that influence the process of foreign policy making and also the theory of humanitarian actions as a form of soft power diplomacy in addressing humanitarian crises. In the policy making of Indonesia in responses to Rakhine state crisis, there were several factors that influenced the policy. First the domestic context, with the social ethic and the rise of solidarity of Indonesian civil society driven by the country’s majority Muslim populations. International context, with the position of Indonesia as a good bilateral partner of Myanmar and its position as ‘de facto’ ASEAN leaders. And third, security context with the interest to protect national security. By considering various context, Indonesia put forward soft power diplomacy as rational choices. In accordance with the theory of soft diplomacy, a country need to co-opts the other party rather than coerces to achieve the goal of the diplomacy. By using this concept, conflict resolution is not carried out with an approach that leads to military power, embargo, or criticism, but rather in a more persuasive way, such as bilateral and multilateral diplomacy and providing inclusive humanitarian assistance. The study also recommends further research on ‘humanitarian diplomacy' and the role of non-state actors, especially religious civil society in international relations. |
| URL Website | cuir.car.chula.ac.th |
