|
Comparative Study on Green Development between China and Thailand —— Based on the Perspective of Management |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Jie Gao |
| Title | Comparative Study on Green Development between China and Thailand —— Based on the Perspective of Management |
| Contributor | Fan Wang |
| Publisher | Rattanakosin International College of Creative Entrepreneurship (RICE) Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin (RMUTR) |
| Publication Year | 2569 |
| Journal Title | RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management |
| Journal Vol. | 7 |
| Journal No. | 1 |
| Page no. | 42-55 |
| Keyword | Green Development, cultural exchange, sustainable development, global sustainable practices |
| URL Website | https://so12.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RJCM |
| Website title | RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management |
| ISSN | 2821-9074 |
| Abstract | Objective This study aims to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of green development in China and Thailand from a management perspective, identifying key differences and commonalities in policies, industries, technologies, and public awareness to inform future cooperation and global sustainable practices. Methods Using a multi-method approach that integrates literature review, comparative analysis, and case studies, this study systematically compares China and Thailand across five dimensions: policy management, industrial development, technological innovation, green awareness cultivation, and representative case practices. The analytical framework focuses on policy governance structure, stakeholder participation, industrial specialization, and innovation mechanisms to enhance methodological clarity and rigor. Results The comparative analysis reveals that China adopts a centralized, top-down governance model, whereas Thailand emphasizes stakeholder collaboration and community participation. China demonstrates stronger performance in large-scale green sectors such as new energy, while Thailand shows comparative advantages in niche and flexible fields such as organic agriculture and ecotourism. In technological innovation, China leads in green R&D investment and overall innovation capacity, whereas Thailand performs better in selected application-oriented areas such as ecotourism technology. In terms of public awareness cultivation, China relies more on systematic education and media promotion, while Thailand draws more heavily on cultural traditions and grassroots engagement. These findings indicate strong complementarities between the two countries and highlight substantial potential for bilateral learning and joint innovation. Implications The study provides a blueprint for mutually beneficial cooperation in green development. Policymakers can use the findings to enhance institutional design and public engagement, while practitioners may apply insights to foster industry synergies and capacity-building. It also contributes to global sustainability by offering comparative, practical solutions tailored to different national contexts. |
