|
Increasing Drug Adherence by Using Pharmaceutical Care and Multimedia for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Thitinan Kupapan |
| Title | Increasing Drug Adherence by Using Pharmaceutical Care and Multimedia for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder |
| Contributor | Theeraporn Chusakul, Juntip Kanjanasilp, Saithip Sutthiruksa |
| Publisher | Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences KKU MSU UBU |
| Publication Year | 2559 |
| Journal Title | Isan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences |
| Journal Vol. | 12 |
| Journal No. | 2 |
| Page no. | 33-43 |
| Keyword | Depressive disorder, Drug adherence, Pharmaceutical care, Multimedia, Drug related problems |
| URL Website | https://tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJPS |
| Website title | Isan Journal ofPharmaceutical Sciences, IJPS |
| ISSN | 19050852 |
| Abstract | Introduction: This study aim to evaluate the effects of multimedia with pharmaceutical care to promote adherence for patients with depressive disorders. Method: The design of this study was a randomized controlled trial. Outpatients with major depressive disorder were recruited. Sixty-eight patients were randomized to the experimental group which were assigned to watch multimedia related cause of depressive disorder, principle of treatment, adverse drug reaction management combine with pharmaceutical care (33 cases) and the control group which were received usual care (35 cases). Result: The participants of the study were not significantly different in characteristics except alcohol consumption is greater number in experimental than control group while exercise in experimental group is less than control group. However, these two factors are not effect to adherence. Baseline of adherence, drugs related problems (adverse drug reaction and drug interaction), knowledge and understanding of disease and medication were not different between experimental and control group. After 1 month of the study, the results showed that the experimental group (0.9 ? 1.40 points) had scores on adherence significantly better than control group (2.2 ? 1.71 points) (p |
