|
Adoption of Value-Based Confiscation in Gambling Case |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Rittirong Bhumisawasdi |
| Title | Adoption of Value-Based Confiscation in Gambling Case |
| Publisher | DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion. |
| Publication Year | 2566 |
| Journal Title | Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal |
| Journal Vol. | 3 |
| Journal No. | 4 |
| Page no. | 111-128 |
| Keyword | Value-based Confiscation, Gambling Case, Adoption. |
| URL Website | https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IARJ/about |
| Website title | https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IARJ/article/view/267519 |
| ISSN | 2774-0374 |
| Abstract | At present, the criminal offense in the case of gambling where the perpetrator intends to benefit the economy is important because it only commits the offense of converting the property acquired through the offense. To amend the limitation of the penalty for forfeiture of property acquired through the commission of a gambling offense under the Gambling Act 1935, due to the forfeiture of such property, courts can order the offender to pay the value of the property the offender acquired by or acquired for the commission of the offense. without specifying any specific assets. Thus, this research aims to 1) study the background, meaning, notion, and theory of confiscation, 2) study law related to confiscation in Thailand and foreign country, 3) analyze the problem and obstacles related to value-based confiscation in gambling cases and 4) summarize and provide a process of value-based confiscation in the gambling case. This research is a qualitative study, investigated by document research, such as law, academic journals, research papers, relevant articles, documents from the judgment of the court and Constitution Court of Thailand and foreign countries, and documents from websites and online channels both in Thai and foreign languages. The document was analyzed and presented by descriptive analysis. This research presented that according to Gambling Act B.E. 2478, money, properties or rewards could be confiscated from gamblers in case of gambling situation. Money or properties relating to gambling cases were distributed and transferred, it could not be confiscated. Measurement of asset and property on Gambling Act B.E. 2478 applied a regulation of specific confiscation. It implied that the confiscated properties relating to gambling deeds. When the official order from the Court was announced, properties should be existing. Therefore, hiding property became a problem that affected the procedures of government officials. They could not track the hiding property and gamblers still received advantages from their wrong behaviors. As a result, Gambling Act B.E. 2478, section 10 was revised and added a new definition of property relating to wrong behavior. |
