|
Sustainability of Urban Watershed Management in Kendari City, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | 1. Kahirun 2. La Baco Sudia 3. Laode Sabaruddin 4. Nasaruddin |
| Title | Sustainability of Urban Watershed Management in Kendari City, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia |
| Publisher | Thai Society of Higher Education Institutes on Environment |
| Publication Year | 2566 |
| Journal Title | EnvironmentAsia |
| Journal Vol. | 16 |
| Journal No. | 3 |
| Page no. | 26-42 |
| Keyword | Carrying capacity, Leverage attributes, Multidimensional scaling, Sustainability, Urban watershed |
| URL Website | http://www.tshe.org/ea/index.html |
| Website title | EnvironmentAsia |
| ISSN | 1906-1714 |
| Abstract | According to the tendency to decrease the carrying capacity of several urban watersheds in Kendari City, it is necessary to conduct research to evaluate the sustainability of the carrying capacity of urban watersheds based on its five dimensions and determine the sensitive attributes (leverage) that affect this sustainability, as well as test the accuracy of the model used. The analysis uses the Rapid Appraisal for Urban Watershed (RAPURWA) method, with Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) techniques, and validation tests on Monte Carlo, Stress, and the coefficient of determination (R2). The study results showed that the Anggoeya, Abeli, and Lemo watersheds were quite sustainable with sustainability status values of 56.31, 55.15, and 53.57 respectively. While the sustainability status of the Nokambu and Matanggonawe watersheds has a value of 42.70 and 45.75 respectively, so they are considered less sustainable. For the sustainability status of the watersheds dimension, land, hydrology, and regional spatial use have respective values of 53.84, 62.28, and 59.90 (quite sustainable). In contrast, socio-economic investment and water buildings have respective values of 46.51 and 39.96 (less sustainable). Furthermore, attributes that utilize all dimensions that require careful attention, namely vegetation cover, slopes, degraded land, floods, sedimentation, water utilization, income, and welfare, implementation of regulations, drainage channels, amount of investment in water development, clean water networks, flood control, ecotourism, mangrove forests, landslide-prone areas, flood-prone areas, and protected areas. The MDS method validation test is able to provide more accurate results. |
