Value of FDG PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in Initial Staging of Colorectal Cancer - Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT
รหัสดีโอไอ
Creator 1. Anchisa Kunawudhi
2. Karun Sereeborwornthanasak; Chetsadaporn Promteangtrong; Bunchorn Siripongpreeda; Saiphet Vanprom; Chanisa Chotipanich
Title Value of FDG PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in Initial Staging of Colorectal Cancer - Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT
Publisher APJCP
Publication Year 2559
Journal Title Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Journal Vol. 17
Journal No. 8
Page no. 4071-4075
Keyword Colorectal cancer ; pre-operative ; staging ; PET/CT ; contrast-enhanced CT
Abstract Background: FDG PET/CT is at an equivocal stage to recommend for staging of colorectal cancer as compared to contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT). This study was intended to evaluate the value of FDG PET/ceCT in colorectal cancer staging as compared to ceCT alone. Materials and Methods: PET/ceCT was performed for 61 colorectal cancer patients who were prospectively enrolled in the study. Three patients were excluded due to loss to follow-up. PET/ceCT ndings and ceCT results alone were read seperately. The treatment planning was then determined by tumor board consensus. The criteria for T staging were determined by the ndings of ceCT. Nodal positive by PET/ceCT imaging was determined by visual analysis of FDG uptake greater than regional background blood pool activity. The diagnostic accuracy of T and N staging was determined only in patients who received surgery without any neoadjuvant treatment. Results: Of 58 patients, there were 40 with colon cancers including sigmoid cancers and 18 with rectal cancers. PET/ceCT in pre-operative staging detected bone metastasis and metastatic inguinal lymph nodes (M1a) that were undepicted on CT in 2 patients (3%), clearly de ned 19 equivocal lesions on ceCT in 18 patients (31%) and excluded 6 metastatic lesions diagnosed by ceCT in 6 patients (10%). These resulted in alteration of management plan in 15 out of the 58 cases (26%) i.e. changing from chemotherapy to surgery (4), changing extent of surgery (9) and avoidance of futile surgery (2). Forty four patients underwent surgery within 45 days after PET/CT. The diagnostic accuracy for N staging with PET/ceCT and ceCT alone was 66% and 48% with false positive rates of 24% (6/25) and 76% (19/25) and false negative rates of 47% (9/19) and 21% (4/19), respectively. All of the false negative lymph nodes from PET/ceCT were less than a centimeter in size and located in peri-lesional regions. The diagnostic accuracy for T staging was 82%. The sensitivity of the peri-lesional fat stranding sign in determining T3 stage was 94% and the speci city was 54%. Conclusions: Our study suggested promising roles of PET/ceCT in initial staging of colorectal cancer with better diagnostic accuracy facilitating management planning.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

บรรณานุกรม

EndNote

APA

Chicago

MLA

ดิจิตอลไฟล์

Digital File
DOI Smart-Search
สวัสดีค่ะ ยินดีให้บริการสอบถาม และสืบค้นข้อมูลตัวระบุวัตถุดิจิทัล (ดีโอไอ) สำนักการวิจัยแห่งชาติ (วช.) ค่ะ