|
Developing An Educational Institution Administration Model Based On The Concept Of Lifelong Learning |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Phumphakhawat Phumphongkhochasorn |
| Title | Developing An Educational Institution Administration Model Based On The Concept Of Lifelong Learning |
| Contributor | Arjin Jaroonpol, Pathomsuk Seeladlour, Naraya Sirapanuwat, Khomson Wongraksa |
| Publisher | DR.KET INSTITUTE OF ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PROMOTION |
| Publication Year | 2568 |
| Journal Title | Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Development |
| Journal Vol. | 3 |
| Journal No. | 1 |
| Page no. | 44-59 |
| Keyword | Developing Model, Educational institution administration, Lifelong Learning |
| URL Website | https://so12.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JISDIADP/about |
| Website title | https://so12.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JISDIADP/index |
| ISSN | 2822-1060 |
| Abstract | The objectives of this research were to: (1) examine an educational institution administration model based on the concept of lifelong learning; (2) develop an educational institution administration model based on the concept of lifelong learning; and (3) evaluate and validate an educational institution administration model based on the concept of lifelong learning. A mixed-methods research design was employed, consisting of 4 phases. Data were collected from two groups: 9 experts selected through purposive sampling and a sample of 400 participants chosen using stratified random sampling. The research instruments included in-depth interviews, a questionnaire with a reliability coefficient of 0.854, and an evaluation and validation form. Data analysis involved content analysis, frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and exploratory factor analysis.The findings revealed that: (1) the analysis of the components of an educational institution administration model based on the concept of lifelong learning identified 5 components and 22 indicators; (2) the developed model consisted of 5 main elements; Education policy and planning development, Curriculum and learning model development, Teacher and educational personnel development, Establishment of learning resources and educational infrastructure and Promotion of educational collaboration and networking; and (3) the evaluation and validation results indicated that the model was deemed appropriate, accurate, useful, and feasible. |
